| Deviant Login | Shop |
 | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
| Cartoons & Comics / Traditional Media / Comics / Pages | ©2011-2012 ~LiamSharp |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `TimberClipse's dedication to our community is without question. From developing helpful tutorials, to being a community leader in groups such as #fella and #deviant365, you can always find Zev connecting with all areas of our community in order to spread his infectious enthusiasm and inspiring positivity. We are delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for May 2012 to `TimberClipse, congratulations! Read More
|
Sta.sh
--
[link]
--
-~*
--
--
Keight
==
"There aint no such thing as a free lunch." - R. A. Heinlein
--
Is all that we see or seem, but a dream within a dream? ~Edgar Allan Poe
Out of curiosity, what's the general consensus of the place traditionally painted comic art has in comics (as far as big companies are concerned) these days? That is to say if you're going for a fully painted look, would you get grief if you said you'd rather use acrylic than photoshop?
The impression i get is that most people switch to digital because they feel they have more control over it, more so if the comic art involves a 3 man team (penciller, inker, colourist). Fully painted art seems more localized to comics where everyone agrees it would benefit from that choice (e.g. fantasy and i suppose Indie).
--
_________
Brutal Horror Webcomic! Enter Genma Visage [link]
--
Owen met the Crazy Fox on a midnight moor. After a seductive tango he trapped it and it has been spewing out advice and drawings ever since.