ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
Something else that get's me angry...
Why can't artist's be EXPECTED to experiment? To try new things? To be innovative?
Why is it that drawing in the same style forever is viewed as THE BEST approach?
How do we unlearn this?
How do we encourage creators to be daring, and our readers to be more open and daring too?
I admit it.
I chop and I change, and if you're looking for a book that is consistent then you'd better not invest any time in me! As a result I've lost many fans over the years. People at cons sometimes say 'where did you go after The Hulk? I thought you must have left the industry...'
They never knew I was always here, but always changing.
Case in point - 'Captain Stone is Missing...' (FREE on dA here: www.deviantart.com/art/Captain…) may be, in my opinion, the best work of my career, but consistent it is not!!!
For me there are artists that are able to produce work that spans decades in a style that remains consistent, professional and inspired. I envy these guys enormously! Page one of 'Watchmen' drawn by my friend and personal hero Dave Gibbons looks to my eyes as if it was drawn the day before the last page of issue 12. It's an incredible achievement! (He begs to differ by the way!) But then there are artists like the equally brilliant Moebius who would change styles page to page, even panel to panel, depending on his mood, aspects of his life, or a suddenly flash of inspiration.
I definitely fall into the second category!
I'm a jack of many trades, and can pencil, ink, paint in several mediums, and work digitally - even utilizing 3D aspects at one point in my career.
My drawing style is all over the bloody place.
I have no system, no fall-back stylistically, and no attack plan.
I dive in to any project with ebullience and naivety, full-steam ahead and cavalier in a take-no-prisoners way.
I have no idea what I'm doing, but I will give it my all, or die trying, and sometimes these efforts will fail. Sometimes royally!
Is it wrong to do this?
Well - some might say "yes", and others "no".
No - in that it has resulted in a strong regard from fellow creators who get the scope and the inherent daring of what I attempt in my work.
They know how hard it is, and they see a creator that is constantly reaching for something, attempting to evolve; to grow; to learn.
I appreciate this enormously from these people, and it is certainly humbling. It makes me what I would categorize as 'an artist's artist', not a fan fav.
Yes - in that it's a perilous route, as it means editors can be a little wary as they have no way of knowing what to expect.
They have to trust my vision, and naturally they have the eyes of the corporations peering over their shoulders.
Also - as mentioned - it is hard for fans to follow, to get their teeth into. They have no way of knowing if they will even like the next 'Liam Sharp' project, because it could be so far removed from the one before it, the one they really loved.
In practice I veer between the mainstream - like Jim Lee - and the great stylists - like Bill Sienkiewicz.
I'm between a pillar and a post.
So - would I choose to have it any other way?
The truth is I don't have a choice in the matter.
I am the artist I am.
I've loved the opportunity to work such varied material, and have responded to it in the only way I've known how: always looking for a way for my art to best reflect the content.
Slicker artists are more popular.
More consistent artists are more popular.
I accept that.
And I have, on occasion, walked that road and enjoyed the fruits of it. 'Death's Head II', and 'Gears of War' were the most consistent jobs I ever did, and they easily sold the most.
But would I, could I be happy maintaining those styles indefinitely?
No.
Absolutely, unequivocally not.
I, as an artist, care more about my personal growth than I do about fame.
Life is too short, and serving corporations until I burn out and am no longer in vogue - that has no appeal.
So I'll trade mass-appeal for integrity and continue to follow the root my heart has dictated.
It might not be the clever way to go, but - as the cliche goes - it's my way.
It is my view that this growing revolution of creators doing their own thing will change the face of storytelling in visual mediums forever. It will become a global boutique of personal projects - projects that embolden writers and artists, that reinvent the norms, and free us of expectations. They will be honest in way they can not be through the old corporate paths.
They will be YOU stories, and MY stories, and collectively OUR stories.
Meanwhile: This time ask me a question. I'll do my best to give you a straight-up answer!
Note: This was adapted from an earlier journal that seemed relevant to this current thread of journals, so don't hate me for a bit of copy and paste! There will be more as I find relevance in old posts!
Why can't artist's be EXPECTED to experiment? To try new things? To be innovative?
Why is it that drawing in the same style forever is viewed as THE BEST approach?
How do we unlearn this?
How do we encourage creators to be daring, and our readers to be more open and daring too?
I admit it.
I chop and I change, and if you're looking for a book that is consistent then you'd better not invest any time in me! As a result I've lost many fans over the years. People at cons sometimes say 'where did you go after The Hulk? I thought you must have left the industry...'
They never knew I was always here, but always changing.
Case in point - 'Captain Stone is Missing...' (FREE on dA here: www.deviantart.com/art/Captain…) may be, in my opinion, the best work of my career, but consistent it is not!!!
For me there are artists that are able to produce work that spans decades in a style that remains consistent, professional and inspired. I envy these guys enormously! Page one of 'Watchmen' drawn by my friend and personal hero Dave Gibbons looks to my eyes as if it was drawn the day before the last page of issue 12. It's an incredible achievement! (He begs to differ by the way!) But then there are artists like the equally brilliant Moebius who would change styles page to page, even panel to panel, depending on his mood, aspects of his life, or a suddenly flash of inspiration.
I definitely fall into the second category!
I'm a jack of many trades, and can pencil, ink, paint in several mediums, and work digitally - even utilizing 3D aspects at one point in my career.
My drawing style is all over the bloody place.
I have no system, no fall-back stylistically, and no attack plan.
I dive in to any project with ebullience and naivety, full-steam ahead and cavalier in a take-no-prisoners way.
I have no idea what I'm doing, but I will give it my all, or die trying, and sometimes these efforts will fail. Sometimes royally!
Is it wrong to do this?
Well - some might say "yes", and others "no".
No - in that it has resulted in a strong regard from fellow creators who get the scope and the inherent daring of what I attempt in my work.
They know how hard it is, and they see a creator that is constantly reaching for something, attempting to evolve; to grow; to learn.
I appreciate this enormously from these people, and it is certainly humbling. It makes me what I would categorize as 'an artist's artist', not a fan fav.
Yes - in that it's a perilous route, as it means editors can be a little wary as they have no way of knowing what to expect.
They have to trust my vision, and naturally they have the eyes of the corporations peering over their shoulders.
Also - as mentioned - it is hard for fans to follow, to get their teeth into. They have no way of knowing if they will even like the next 'Liam Sharp' project, because it could be so far removed from the one before it, the one they really loved.
In practice I veer between the mainstream - like Jim Lee - and the great stylists - like Bill Sienkiewicz.
I'm between a pillar and a post.
So - would I choose to have it any other way?
The truth is I don't have a choice in the matter.
I am the artist I am.
I've loved the opportunity to work such varied material, and have responded to it in the only way I've known how: always looking for a way for my art to best reflect the content.
Slicker artists are more popular.
More consistent artists are more popular.
I accept that.
And I have, on occasion, walked that road and enjoyed the fruits of it. 'Death's Head II', and 'Gears of War' were the most consistent jobs I ever did, and they easily sold the most.
But would I, could I be happy maintaining those styles indefinitely?
No.
Absolutely, unequivocally not.
I, as an artist, care more about my personal growth than I do about fame.
Life is too short, and serving corporations until I burn out and am no longer in vogue - that has no appeal.
So I'll trade mass-appeal for integrity and continue to follow the root my heart has dictated.
It might not be the clever way to go, but - as the cliche goes - it's my way.
It is my view that this growing revolution of creators doing their own thing will change the face of storytelling in visual mediums forever. It will become a global boutique of personal projects - projects that embolden writers and artists, that reinvent the norms, and free us of expectations. They will be honest in way they can not be through the old corporate paths.
They will be YOU stories, and MY stories, and collectively OUR stories.
Meanwhile: This time ask me a question. I'll do my best to give you a straight-up answer!
Note: This was adapted from an earlier journal that seemed relevant to this current thread of journals, so don't hate me for a bit of copy and paste! There will be more as I find relevance in old posts!
On Detail
It seems I'm becoming known for my excessive detailing and textures. This is great, and I'm pleased to have a trait that is becoming a recognized feature of my art. But - and it's an important but, because it's to do with the craft of storytelling - I do work hard to balance the detailed pages with others that have a large amount of negative space or much simpler compositions, otherwise it's all just so much noise and the point is lost. I LOVE getting stuck into in all the intricacies that are part of making a, hopefully, believable world for my readers, but I try to leave room to breath too.
A city looks most impressive when you've driven o
It has been too long
Well, what a crazy couple of years! First Wonder Woman with the amazing Greg Rucka, then an issue of The Justice League with Rob Venditti, and after that The Brave and The Bold: Batman and Wonder Woman, which I also had the joy and honour of writing!
It has taken a LOOOOOONG time to get back onto the iconic books of my youth. I never thought I would - had kind of given up hope to some extent, after all it had been decades! I thought I was an almost-ran, somewhat a has-been, so my comeback was very unexpected. And what a comeback it turned out to be!
I'm now mid way through issue three of my latest DC series, The Green Lantern, with legendar
PARADISE REX PRESS, INC
Extremely thrilled about this: https://app.mailerlite.com/j9w9k6
My second prose publication after 'God Killers' is finally available - and with an afterword by the great China Miéville!
I'll be honest - I'm really nervous about it, now it's actually out! It's ferociously honest, very much a soul-bearing.
It's angry, it's odd, it's highly experimental, and it's verging on confessional - which perhaps is no surprise to anybody who reads my journals!
I have no doubt that some people will think it is pretentious, impenetrable crap - a one-trick pony.
But - I know it has also found its fans. China Mieville, for example, spent a long aft
What Are We To Do?
What ARE we to do?
I write to this miniscule bubble of mostly like-minded liberal friends - as like attracts like, and we've all learned the hard way in recent times that we are NOT the consensus.
As we slip into another inevitable age, who survives?
Because we will not change our ways - don't want to, or deny the proof of it - what then?
Do we take up the arms of those we have battled? Do we harden ourselves, cast aside our compassion for all human kind, and look no further than our defensible perimeter?
Do we prepare for the inevitable losses, and stop wasting our time with futile battles against elite institutions so powerful that non
© 2014 - 2024 LiamRSharp
Comments44
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Great points here Liam!